pubmed-article:19504611 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0030705 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19504611 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0010346 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19504611 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0014245 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19504611 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0728940 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19504611 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0034897 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19504611 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0336791 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19504611 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205210 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19504611 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0439185 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:issue | 2 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2010-1-18 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:abstractText | Ileocolonoscopy poses the gold standard in the evaluation of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease (CD) at the site of ileocolonic anastomosis. Magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE) on the other hand is a promising technique for small bowel imaging. The aim was to compare MRE and ileocolonoscopy for predicting clinical recurrence in CD patients who have undergone ileocolonic resection. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:month | Feb | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:issn | 1536-4844 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ReinischWalte... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SchimaWolfgan... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:TuretschekKar... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:VogelsangHara... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SailerJohanne... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:PeloschekPhil... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MiehslerWolfg... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:FletcherJoelJ | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:FerlitschArnu... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KoilakouStavr... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:issnType | Electronic | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:volume | 16 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:pagination | 198-203 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2010-11-18 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:19504611... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:year | 2010 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:articleTitle | Endoscopy and MR enteroclysis: equivalent tools in predicting clinical recurrence in patients with Crohn's disease after ileocolic resection. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Internal Medicine III, Division of Gastroenterology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:19504611 | pubmed:publicationType | Clinical Trial | lld:pubmed |