Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1947105rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021289lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1947105lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0817096lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1947105lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0259980lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1947105lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0596446lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:dateCreated1991-12-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:abstractTextTo evaluate use of a digital photostimulable phosphor imaging system in the neonatal nursery, 150 newborns were divided into three groups of 50. In the first two groups, screen-film and computed radiographs of the chest were obtained at the same radiation exposure; in the third group, computed radiographs were obtained with a 50% dose reduction (half-exposure computed radiographs). All images were blindly evaluated by three readers who scored the quality of visualization of the mediastinum, lung, bone, soft tissues, and endotracheal and nasogastric tubes, and also image density. No statistical differences in visualization of tubes existed among the three groups. Visualization of the mediastinum, lung, bones, and soft tissues was statistically significantly better on computed radiographs than on half-exposure computed radiographs; visualization of the lungs, bones, and soft tissues was statistically significantly better on screen-film radiographs than half-exposure computed radiographs. Image density was statistically better on computed and half-exposure computed radiographs than on screen-film radiographs.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:issn0033-8419lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SmithJ AJAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WhiteS JSJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CohenM DMDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KaneA BABlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LongBBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KalasinskiL...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:volume181lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:pagination829-32lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1947105-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1947105-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1947105-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1947105-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1947105-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:articleTitleDigital imaging with a photostimulable phosphor in the chest of newborns.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Radiology, Riley Hospital for Children, Indianapolis, IN 46202-5200.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1947105pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1947105lld:pubmed