Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1942990rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0014733lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1942990lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034897lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1942990lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280519lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1942990lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0053083lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:dateCreated1991-12-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:abstractTextThe trial entered 66 patients with recurrent erysipelas treated conventionally with addition of either immunostimulator bemitil (0.25-0.5 g/day orally for 5-7 days) or placebo. The bemitil group was free of intoxication symptoms and local manifestations, discharged from hospital sooner than the controls. Therapeutic efficacy of bemitil is due to its promotion of mononuclear phagocytes function which acts as an essential mechanism of antibacterial defence activation in patients with recurrent erysipelas.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:languageruslld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:issn0023-2149lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RatnikovaL...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:volume69lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:pagination89-90lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1942990-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1942990-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1942990-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1942990-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1942990-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1942990-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1942990-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1942990-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1942990-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1942990-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1942990-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1942990-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:articleTitle[Effectiveness of bemitil in recurrent erysipelas].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1942990pubmed:publicationTypeControlled Clinical Triallld:pubmed