Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:19214713rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19214713lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005934lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19214713lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2587213lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19214713lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0680536lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19214713lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1517004lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:dateCreated2009-6-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:abstractTextGlass polyalkenoate cements based on strontium calcium zinc silicate glasses (Zn-GPCs) and high molecular weight polyacrylic acids (PAA) (MW; 52,000-210,000) have been shown to exhibit mechanical properties and in vitro bioactivity suitable for arthroplasty applications. Unfortunately, these formulations exhibit working times and setting times which are too short for invasive surgical applications such as bone void filling and fracture fixation. In this study, Zn-GPCs were formulated using a low molecular weight PAA (MW; 12,700) and a modifying agent, trisodium citrate dihydrate (TSC), with the aim of improving the rheological properties of Zn-GPCs. These novel formulations were then compared with commercial self-setting calcium phosphate cement, Hydroset, in terms of compressive strength, biaxial flexural strength and Young's modulus, as well as working time, setting time and injectability. The novel Zn-GPC formulations performed well, with prolonged mechanical strength (39 MPa, compression) greater than both vertebral bone (18.4 MPa) and the commercial control (14 MPa). However, working times (2 min) and rheological properties of Zn-GPCs, though improved, require further modifications prior to their use in minimally invasive surgical techniques.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:issn1573-4838lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BoydDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MadiganSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TowlerM RMRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ClarkinO MOMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:volume20lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:pagination1563-70lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19214713...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19214713...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19214713...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19214713...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:year2009lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:articleTitleComparison of an experimental bone cement with a commercial control, Hydroset.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:affiliationMaterials and Surface Science Institute, University of Limerick, National Technological Park, Limerick, Ireland.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19214713pubmed:publicationTypeEvaluation Studieslld:pubmed