Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:19182832rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0008059lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19182832lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1504389lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19182832lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0006463lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19182832lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009647lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19182832lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1979963lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19182832lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2003903lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19182832lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0201734lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19182832lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2348070lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19182832lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205171lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:dateCreated2009-8-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:abstractTextWe studied the pharmacokinetic (PK) profile of single daily dose i.v. BU in children who underwent reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) transplantation. A cohort of 19 patients < or =4 years of age (group 1) and 33 patients >4 years (group 2) was studied. Patients received a BU test dose for PK studies, followed by two treatment doses adjusted to target an area under the curve (AUC) of 4000 microM min per day. Patients in group 1 attained a lower AUC as compared to group 2 (3568 vs 4035 microM min). In group 1, 67% patients and in group 2, 84% patients achieved AUC within the targeted range. Stable donor chimerism was achieved in 56% patients in group 1 and 79% in group 2. Eight patients required a second transplantation because of graft failure. Because of the concern that a low AUC adversely affected outcomes, a second cohort of 23 patients followed a modified protocol with a targeted AUC of 5000 microM min. A higher AUC was attained (4825 microM min). Stable donor chimerism was achieved in 91% of patients. Our results show that RIC regimens using two single daily doses of i.v. BU are effective in children, but a targeted AUC of 5000 microM min is recommended.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:monthAuglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:issn1476-5365lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChaudhurySSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchneidermanJ...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JacobsohnDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HayJ CJClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KletzelMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DuerstRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:volume44lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:pagination145-56lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19182832...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:year2009lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:articleTitleAge-dependent pharmacokinetic profile of single daily dose i.v. busulfan in children undergoing reduced-intensity conditioning stem cell transplant.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60614, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19182832pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed