Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:19130636rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040607lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19130636lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1293097lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19130636lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016517lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19130636lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19130636lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0872279lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19130636lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0557806lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:dateCreated2009-1-7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:abstractTextThe purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of periodization and to compare different periodization models in resistance trained American football players. Fifty-one experienced resistance trained American football players of an NCAA Division III football team (after 10 weeks of active rest) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups that differed only in the manipulation of the intensity and volume of training during a 15-week offseason resistance training program. Group 1 participated in a nonperiodized (NP) training program, group 2 participated in a traditional periodized linear (PL) training program, and group 3 participated in a planned nonlinear periodized (PNL) training program. Strength and power testing occurred before training (PRE), after 7 weeks of training (MID), and at the end of the training program (POST). Significant increases in maximal (1-repetition maximum [1RM]) squat, 1RM bench press, and vertical jump were observed from PRE to MID for all groups; these increases were still significantly greater at POST; however, no MID to POST changes were seen. Significant PRE to POST improvements in the medicine ball throw (MBT) were seen for PL group only. The results do not provide a clear indication as to the most effective training program for strength and power enhancements in already trained football players. Interestingly, recovery of training-related performances was achieved after only 7 weeks of training, yet further gains were not observed. These data indicate that longer periods of training may be needed after a long-term active recovery period and that active recovery may need to be dramatically shortened to better optimize strength and power in previously trained football players.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:issn1533-4287lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KernH WHWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KraemerWillia...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RatamessNicho...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HoffmanJay...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FaigenbaumAve...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KlattMarcMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RossRyan ERElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TranchinaNich...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:authorpubmed-author:McCurleyRober...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:volume23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:pagination11-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:19130636...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:year2009lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:articleTitleComparison between different off-season resistance training programs in Division III American college football players.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Health and Exercise Science, The College of New Jersey, Ewing, New Jersey, USA. hoffmanj@tcnj.edulld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:19130636pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed