pubmed-article:1907609 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0012655 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1907609 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0441833 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1907609 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0085494 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1907609 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0002556 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1907609 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1511790 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1907609 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0947504 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1907609 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1999270 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1907609 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0683598 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1907609 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0016698 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1907609 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0332256 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1907609 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1553467 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1907609 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1553145 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1907609 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0439536 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1907609 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205349 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:issue | 6 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1991-9-6 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:abstractText | Both conventional and modified MicroScan Type 5 panels and Vitek Gram-Positive Susceptibility cards were compared with agar dilution screen plates for their abilities to detect high-level resistance to gentamicin and streptomycin in 235 enterococcal isolates, including 167 Enterococcus faecalis and 63 E. faecium isolates. The modified Type 5 panels contained dextrose-phosphate broth instead of Mueller-Hinton broth in their high-level-resistance screen wells. The sensitivities for detection of gentamicin and streptomycin high-level resistance were 100 and 100% (E. faecalis) and 100 and 94% (E. faecium) for the modified MicroScan panels, 100 and 89% (E. faecalis) and 100 and 98% (E. faecium) for the conventional MicroScan panels, and 81 and 86% (E. faecalis) and 85 and 94% (E. faecium) for the Vitek cards. All specificities were 100% except for the Vitek cards with streptomycin, where it was 96%. Isolates that showed resistance on the streptomycin agar screen plates were rescreened on plates containing 32,000 micrograms/ml to detect ribosomally mediated resistance. For all three systems, every failure to detect streptomycin high-level resistance occurred in isolates with enzymatic, not ribosomal, resistance. The modified MicroScan Type 5 panels are a suitable method for detecting enterococcal high-level resistance to gentamicin and streptomycin. The Vitek cards are too insensitive for this purpose. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:commentsCorrections | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:month | Jun | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:issn | 0095-1137 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:WennerstenCC | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:FerraroM JMJ | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:WeissmannDD | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SpargoJJ | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:volume | 29 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:pagination | 1232-5 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2009-11-18 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1907609-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1907609-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1907609-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1907609-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1907609-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1907609-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1907609-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1907609-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1907609-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1907609-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1907609-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:year | 1991 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:articleTitle | Detection of enterococcal high-level aminoglycoside resistance with MicroScan freeze-dried panels containing newly modified medium and Vitek Gram-Positive Susceptibility cards. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston 02114. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1907609 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1907609 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1907609 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1907609 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1907609 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1907609 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1907609 | lld:pubmed |
http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:1907609 | lld:pubmed |