Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1899399rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0086418lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1899399lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0229671lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1899399lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0037868lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1899399lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0003241lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1899399lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0020852lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1899399lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1441615lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1899399lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1899399lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439852lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1899399lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0079603lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1899399lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1527121lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:dateCreated1991-3-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:abstractTextThe relative sensitivities of the indirect immunobead test, the indirect flo cytometric immunofluorescence assay, and an indirect radiolabeled antiglobulin assay were compared. Eighteen immunobead test positive sera and 18 negative sera were used as the standard for the other two assays. Of the 18 positive sera, 14 (77%) and 5 (27%) were positive in the immunofluorescence assay and the radiolabeled antiglobulin assay, respectively. Four (22%) of the low titer immunobead test positive sera were negative by both the immunofluorescence assay and the radiolabeled antiglobulin assay. However, there was a significant positive correlation between the results of the immunofluorescence assay and the radiolabeled antiglobulin assay (r = 0.73) and between the results of the radiolabeled antiglobulin assay and the titer of the immunobead test (r = 0.82). The use of an unselected sperm population in the radiolabeled antiglobulin assay and the classical indirect immunofluorescence method using methanol-fixed sperm gave false-positive results in the radiolabeled antiglobulin assay and the immunofluorescence assay. These results suggested that immunoglobulin G antisperm antibody positive sera may be reactive both to sperm surface and internalized sperm antigens.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:issn0015-0282lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DeBaultL ELElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HaasG GGGJrlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:authorpubmed-author:D'CruzO JOJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:volume55lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:pagination377-88lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1899399-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:articleTitleComparison of the indirect immunobead, radiolabeled, and immunofluorescence assays for immunoglobulin G serum antibodies to human sperm.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:affiliationUniversity of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1899399pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed