Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1879861rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1708726lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1879861lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1948023lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1879861lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0522510lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:dateCreated1991-10-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:abstractTextTwo experiments investigated perceived locus and intensity for electrocutaneous stimulation. In Experiment 1, 21 subjects reported the perceived locus for various combinations of four electrode sites, two current directions, two pulse characteristics (single versus multiple), and two sensation levels (detection versus pain). In Experiment 2, 16 subjects reported the perceived locus and intensity for a wide range of current levels and two polarity conditions. The main results were 1) sensations were likely to be perceived under the cathode at detection levels, but under both electrodes at intense levels; 2) the "cathode" localization was gradually supplanted by "both" ("anode" and "cathode") localization with increasing current; 3) subjective intensity under the cathode was greater than that under the anode; 4) the effects of cathode position on perceived locus were found for only some pairs of electrodes. These results challenge the simple hypothesis that electrical stimulation of the skin through paired electrodes is perceived under the cathode.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:issn0018-9294lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RollmanG BGBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HigashiyamaAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:volume38lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:pagination679-86lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:dateRevised2009-11-11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1879861-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1879861-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1879861-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1879861-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1879861-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1879861-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:articleTitlePerceived locus and intensity of electrocutaneous stimulation.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1879861pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1879861lld:pubmed