pubmed-article:1879854 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0728907 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1879854 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1280500 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1879854 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0220934 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1879854 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1710082 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1879854 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1704711 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1879854 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C2346753 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1879854 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1706201 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1879854 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1553422 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1879854 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1709850 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1879854 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1551356 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:issue | 7 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1991-10-3 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:abstractText | Nonlinear receiver compression effects on the amplitude distribution of backscattered ultrasonic signals are investigated by using digitized RF signals that have been compressed in a commercially made ultrasonic B-scan imaging instrument. Amplitude distributions of compressed RF and video signals were obtained from regions of B-scan images that correspond to approximately the same physical region in a random medium model with known backscatter amplitude characteristics. The amplitude distribution of the signal before compression was obtained by using a table constructed from measurements of the imaging instrument compression characteristics as a function of time gain compensation. While the results indicate the general form of the decompressed data agrees with single parameter model curves that are predicted by a widely employed Gaussian random process model, the signal-to-noise ratios of the decompressed envelope vary up to 20% from the 1.91 value predicted that model. This implies that effects such as nonlinearities, envelope smoothing, and noise which all may be present in varying degrees in practical ultrasonic imaging instrumentation can cause appreciable departures from theoretical data even under highly controlled conditions. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:grant | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:month | Jul | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:issn | 0018-9294 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:CaseT JTJ | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:WaagR CRC | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:DemczarB ABA | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:volume | 38 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:pagination | 628-33 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2009-11-11 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1879854-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1879854-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1879854-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1879854-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1879854-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1879854-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1879854-... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:year | 1991 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:articleTitle | Nonlinear receiver compression effects on the amplitude distribution of backscattered ultrasonic signals. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Radiology, University of Rochester, NY 14627. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:1879854 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | lld:pubmed |