Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:18751504rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0152035lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18751504lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0001554lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18751504lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1708335lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18751504lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031327lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18751504lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0771029lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18751504lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005508lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18751504lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0524527lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:issue7lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:dateCreated2008-8-28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:abstractTextThe bioavailability of a new terbinafine (CAS 91161-71-6) preparation was compared with a commercially available original preparation (reference) of the drug in 19 Chinese healthy male volunteers. The study was performed in an open, randomized, single blind two-sequence, two-period crossover design. Under fasting conditions, each subject received a single oral dose of 250 mg terbinafine as a test or reference formulation with a 7-day washout period between the two preparations. The plasma concentrations of terbinafine were analyzed by a sensitive liquid chromatography-ultraviolet spectrometry method. The pharmacokinetic parameters included AUC(0-t) AUC(0-infinity), C(max), t1/2, and T(max). The values of AUC(0-t) demonstrated nearly identical bioavailability of terbinafine from the examined formulations. The AUC(0.48) of terbinafine was 5982.85 +/- 2449.17 and 6761.63 +/- 3140.33 ng x h/ml for the test and reference formulation, respectively. The maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of terbinafine was 1656.25 +/- 623.18 ng/ml for the test and 1552.07 +/- 660.35 ng/ml for the reference product, respectively. No statistical differences were observed for C(max) and the area under the plasma concentration time curve for terbinafine. The 90% confidence limits calculated for C(max) and AUC from zero to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) of terbinafine were within the bioequivalence range (80%-125% for AUC). This study shows that the test formulation is bioequivalent to the reference formulation of terbinafine.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:issn0004-4172lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChoiY JYJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TianYuanYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WangNaNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JiangXinXlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ZhangZun-Jian...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:volume58lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:pagination363-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18751504...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18751504...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18751504...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18751504...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18751504...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18751504...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18751504...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18751504...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18751504...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18751504...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18751504...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18751504...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18751504...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:year2008lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:articleTitlePharmacokinetics and comparative bioavailability of two terbinafine hydrochloride formulations after single-dose administration in Chinese healthy subjects.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:affiliationLaboratory of Physical and Chemical Analysis, JiangSu Centers for Diseases Prevention and Control, Nanjing, PR China.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18751504pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:18751504lld:pubmed