pubmed-article:18716766 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0007766 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:18716766 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1522577 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:18716766 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:18716766 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0444764 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:18716766 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0332293 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:issue | 11 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2008-10-21 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:abstractText | The purpose of this prospective study was to compare 3T and 1.5T magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) for the follow-up of endovascular treated intracranial aneurysms to assess the grade of occlusion. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:month | Nov | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:issn | 1432-1920 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:LarssonElna-M... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:HoltåsStigS | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:NilssonOla... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:UndrénPerP | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RamgrenBirgit... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:CronqvistMats... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:SiemundRogerR | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:issnType | Electronic | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:volume | 50 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:pagination | 947-54 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18716766... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:year | 2008 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:articleTitle | Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of 3D inflow MRA at 3T and 1.5T and contrast-enhanced MRA at 3T with DSA. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Neuroradiology, Center for Medical Imaging and Physiology, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. birgitta.ramgren@skane.se | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18716766 | pubmed:publicationType | Controlled Clinical Trial | lld:pubmed |