Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:18595834rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521991lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18595834lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007952lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18595834lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242808lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18595834lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705241lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18595834lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705242lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18595834lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0599473lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:issue30lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:dateCreated2008-11-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:abstractTextThe olfactory system sensitively discerns scents from many small molecules as the brain analyses signals from nasal receptors. These receptors are selective to some degree, though the mechanism for selectivity is still controversial. Enantiomers, chiral pairs of left- and right-handed structures, are an important class of molecules in assessing proposed mechanisms. We show that there is a correlation between molecular (structural) flexibility and whether or not the left- and right-handed enantiomers smell the same. In particular, for the fairly extensive class of enantiomers with six-membered ring flexibility, enantiomers do not smell the same. There are, of course, significant experimental uncertainties, which we discuss here. We discuss models of receptor selectivity, both those based on shape and those where discrimination is based on other factors, such as electron affinity, proton affinity or vibration frequencies. The differences in scent of these enantiomers appear to be consistent with simple generalizations of a 'swipe card' model in which, while the shape must be good enough, critical information for actuation is a separate factor.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:issn1742-5689lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StonehamA MAMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HorsfieldA...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BrookesJennif...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:day6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:volume6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:pagination75-86lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:dateRevised2010-9-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18595834...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18595834...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18595834...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18595834...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18595834...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18595834...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18595834...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:year2009lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:articleTitleOdour character differences for enantiomers correlate with molecular flexibility.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK. ucapjcb@ucl.ac.uklld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18595834pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed