Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:18590365rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205307lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18590365lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18590365lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0242568lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18590365lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205420lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18590365lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2346689lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18590365lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1516691lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18590365lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1550025lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:dateCreated2008-7-1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:abstractTextResearch suggests that the severity of left spatial neglect can be modulated by changes in general alertness. Analogous effects in healthy volunteers now suggest that this may reflect an amplified form of a normal pattern. Recent neuropsychological studies also suggest that concurrent cognitive load may exacerbate rightward bias. In this study, for the first time, the authors examined the effect of both factors on spatial bias in healthy volunteers. Participants performed a task in which as many letters as possible needed to be reported from a briefly presented visual array under three conditions (alone, with a syllable-discrimination secondary task and with a pitch-discrimination secondary task). The results confirmed a significant rightward shift associated with time-on-task across all conditions--the first demonstration of such an effect within a fixation controlled, brief presentation task. While the secondary tasks influenced overall visual performance, there was no discernable effect on bias.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:issn0894-4105lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ManlyTomTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DuncanJohnJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CusackRhodriRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DoveAnjaAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PeersPolly...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DoddsChristop...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:authorpubmed-author:van...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:copyrightInfoPsycINFO Database Record (c) 2008 APA, all rights reserved.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:volume22lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:pagination545-52lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18590365...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:year2008lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:articleTitleThe effects of time-on-task and concurrent cognitive load on normal visuospatial bias.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:affiliationUK Medical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, United kingdom.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18590365pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed