Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1858448rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038351lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1858448lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0192440lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1858448lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0192444lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1858448lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0728940lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1858448lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1274040lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:dateCreated1991-8-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:abstractTextBetween 1966 and 1986, Billroth I and Billroth II resections for gastroduodenal ulcers were performed at the Department of Surgery, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena. Early postoperative complications after Billroth II (14.6%) were somewhat rarer than after Billroth I (19.4%), however, bore a greater risk. With a permanent cure accounting for 85%, the comparison of both procedures reveals no significant differences in the late results. In gastric ulcer, Billroth's first method should be given preference because it can be carried out more rapidly in technical respect and takes digestive physiology into account.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:languagegerlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:issn0044-409Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PetratHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JacobMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchröderHHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PetratGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:volume116lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:pagination369-73lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1858448-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1858448-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1858448-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1858448-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1858448-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1858448-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1858448-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1858448-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1858448-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1858448-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1858448-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:articleTitle[Results of Billroth I and Billroth II stomach resection].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:affiliationKlinik für Chirurgic, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1858448pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed