Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:18432444rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0014272lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18432444lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0018810lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18432444lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0162579lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18432444lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0684321lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18432444lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0681916lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18432444lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0750572lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18432444lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030055lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18432444lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18432444lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0680844lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:dateCreated2008-4-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:abstractTextThe aim of this study was to compare estimation of energy expenditure (EE) in working environments, either from accelerometry or from an individual oxygen consumption/heart rate (VO(2)/HR) regression curve. The study participants were 46 volunteer workers aged 27+/-6 years old. A significant correlation between EE predicted by the VO(2)/HR curve and the accelerometer was observed (r=0.78, p <0.01). However, more disparities were observed between the two methods when the mean job intensity was not within 16% and 23% higher than resting HR. The accelerometer overestimated by a mean of 34.4% the prediction by VO(2)/HR regression if the intensity of the task was lower than a total of 1000 kcal/shift and underestimated the prediction by a mean of -24.9% if EE estimation of the work shift was higher than a total of 1500 kcal/shift. Despite a high correlation between both methods in the whole group, EE evaluated by accelerometry does not correspond to EE predicted by the VO(2)/HR regression curves when evaluated individually.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:issn0014-0139lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TrudeauFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BouchardD RDRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:volume51lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:pagination663-70lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18432444...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:year2008lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:articleTitleEstimation of energy expenditure in a work environment: comparison of accelerometry and oxygen consumption/heart rate regression.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:affiliationDépartement des sciences de l'activité physique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18432444pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed