pubmed-article:18432444 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0014272 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:18432444 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0018810 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:18432444 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0162579 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:18432444 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0684321 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:18432444 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0681916 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:18432444 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0750572 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:18432444 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0030055 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:18432444 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:18432444 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0680844 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:issue | 5 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2008-4-24 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:abstractText | The aim of this study was to compare estimation of energy expenditure (EE) in working environments, either from accelerometry or from an individual oxygen consumption/heart rate (VO(2)/HR) regression curve. The study participants were 46 volunteer workers aged 27+/-6 years old. A significant correlation between EE predicted by the VO(2)/HR curve and the accelerometer was observed (r=0.78, p <0.01). However, more disparities were observed between the two methods when the mean job intensity was not within 16% and 23% higher than resting HR. The accelerometer overestimated by a mean of 34.4% the prediction by VO(2)/HR regression if the intensity of the task was lower than a total of 1000 kcal/shift and underestimated the prediction by a mean of -24.9% if EE estimation of the work shift was higher than a total of 1500 kcal/shift. Despite a high correlation between both methods in the whole group, EE evaluated by accelerometry does not correspond to EE predicted by the VO(2)/HR regression curves when evaluated individually. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:month | May | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:issn | 0014-0139 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:TrudeauFF | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BouchardD RDR | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:volume | 51 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:pagination | 663-70 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:18432444... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:year | 2008 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:articleTitle | Estimation of energy expenditure in a work environment: comparison of accelerometry and oxygen consumption/heart rate regression. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:affiliation | Département des sciences de l'activité physique, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:18432444 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | lld:pubmed |