Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1817938rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1301820lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1817938lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1817938lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2003851lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1817938lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1514863lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:issue9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:dateCreated1992-7-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:abstractTextThe reproducibility of movement recordings obtained with the Condylocomp LR 2 was tested on three different types of articulator (Dentatus, SAM 2, Stuart). Additionally, reproducibility of TMJ movement recordings was tested on 18 subjects. Differences of +/- 2 degrees to the real angles, when working carefully, seem to be precise enough. The Condylocomp LR 2 seems to be a useful means for diagnosing and documenting TMJ movements, because it allows dynamic recordings with high resolution and correction of geometric errors.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:languagegerlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:citationSubsetDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:issn0012-1029lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BoseMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OttK HKHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OlavarriaL...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:volume46lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:pagination596-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1817938-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1817938-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1817938-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1817938-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1817938-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1817938-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1817938-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1817938-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1817938-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1817938-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:articleTitle[Studies on the reproducibility of recordings obtained with the Condylocomp LR 2].lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:affiliationPoliklinik für Zahnerhaltung B der Westfalischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1817938pubmed:publicationTypeEnglish Abstractlld:pubmed