Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:18165513rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024530lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18165513lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0687759lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18165513lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009818lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18165513lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0282515lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18165513lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0679006lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18165513lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707391lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18165513lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205088lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:dateCreated2007-12-31lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:abstractTextThree different drugs (mefloquine, atovaquone/proguanil, doxycycline) are recommended for malaria chemoprophylaxis, each with approximately the same efficacy but various adverse event profiles, regimens, and prices. We investigated which medication the travelers would have chosen on the basis of written evidence-based information and the impact that pretravel consultation had on their decision. A prospective study was performed in a travel clinic and private practice, and 1073 travelers were included; 45% chose mefloquine (Lariam or Mephaquine), 21% atovaquone/proguanil (Malarone), 18% doxycycline (Supracycline), 5% "no prophylaxis," and 11% "do not know." Lariam was principally chosen because of prior experience (38%), Mephaquine because of low price (34%), and doxycycline and Malarone because of the profile of adverse events (55% and 43%, respectively). Based on objective written information, travelers most frequently chose mefloquine for chemoprophylaxis. This suggests that evidence-based information weighs more heavily than negative publicity. Taking into account the perspective of the user should improve appropriateness of the pretravel advice.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:issn0002-9637lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GentonBlaiseBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:authorpubmed-author:D'AcremontVal...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LandryPierrePlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SennNicolasNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:volume77lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:pagination1010-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:dateRevised2010-11-18lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18165513...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:year2007lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:articleTitleMalaria chemoprophylaxis: what do the travelers choose, and how does pretravel consultation influence their final decision.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:affiliationTravel Clinic, Department of Ambulatory Care and Community Medicine, Switzerland. nicolas.senn@gmail.comlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18165513pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed