Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:18155866rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031268lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18155866lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0494165lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18155866lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0555952lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18155866lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522577lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18155866lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1274040lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18155866lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18155866lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024485lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18155866lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032743lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18155866lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0850292lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18155866lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205265lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18155866lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332293lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18155866lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1555582lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:dateCreated2008-7-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:abstractTextMorphologic imaging after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of liver metastases is hampered by rim-like enhancement in the ablation margin, making the identification of local tumor progression (LTP) difficult. Follow-up with PET/CT is compared to follow-up with PET alone and MRI after RFA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:monthAuglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:issn0720-048Xlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FrillingAndre...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KuehlHilmarHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AntochGeraldGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BockischAndre...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BarkhausenJoe...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VogtFlorianFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StergarHrvoje...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Veit-HaibachP...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Rosenbaum-Kru...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:volume67lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:pagination362-71lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:18155866...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:year2008lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:articleTitleComparison of FDG-PET, PET/CT and MRI for follow-up of colorectal liver metastases treated with radiofrequency ablation: initial results.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany. hilmar.kuehl@uni-due.de <hilmar.kuehl@uni-due.de>lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:18155866pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:18155866lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:18155866lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:18155866lld:pubmed