| pubmed-article:1812116 | pubmed:abstractText | In an attempt to develop a new and better biological membrane for the pericardium, we evaluated the use of glutaraldehyde treated human amniotic membrane (AM) and compared it to polytetraflouroethylene (PTFE) membrane as a pericardial substitute. Four dogs underwent a right thoracotomy. Two 4 x 3-cm portions of pericardium, 3-4 cm apart, were excised in each animal and both sites replaced with a similar sized patch of 0.8% glutaraldehyde-treated AM and 0.2-mm PTFE membrane respectively. The AM was sutured to the pericardial defect with its smooth surface facing the epicardium. After 18 weeks, the materials were evaluated. The AM patches revealed minimal extrapericardial and no epicardial adhesion. The PTFE patches had moderate to severe epicardial adhesions and severe extrapericardial adhesions. Histopathological examination of AM patches revealed that the integrity of the AM was preserved, however, neovascularization and slight lymphocytic infiltration were observed. In the PTFE patches, there were severe inflammatory infiltration and fibroblast proliferation into both surfaces. AM patches by virtue of their low immunogenicity evoke very minimal host to graft reaction. These AM grafts, however, tear easily unless carefully sutured. Improved methods of treatment may improve suturing strength. We conclude that AM performs satisfactorily and is superior to PTFE as a pericardial substitute. | lld:pubmed |
