Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1805027rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1805027lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205430lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1805027lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0061297lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:issue6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:dateCreated1992-5-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:abstractTextTwo mechanically mixed glass ionomer restorative materials (Ketac-Fil and Fuji Cap II) were compared with two manually mixed products (Chelon-Fil and Fuji Type II). One manually mixed material was substantially weaker than the others in bond strength tests. No significant differences in microleakage were found among the materials.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:citationSubsetDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:issn0022-3913lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CooleyR LRLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TrainT ETElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:volume66lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:pagination773-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1805027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1805027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1805027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1805027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1805027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1805027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1805027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1805027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1805027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1805027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1805027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1805027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1805027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1805027-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:articleTitleComparison of manually and mechanically mixed glass ionomers.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:affiliationDepartment of General Practice, University of Texas Health Science Center, Dental School, San Antonio.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1805027pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed