| pubmed-article:17942204 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0332307 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0333562 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1280500 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C2348693 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:issue | 2 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2008-4-21 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:abstractText | This paper compares different vegetation types (coniferous and deciduous forest, grassed and pure heathland) in terms of input (throughfall deposition) and output (seepage flux) in a region with intermediate nitrogen load (+/-20kg Nha(-1)y(-1) via bulk precipitation) in comparable conditions in north Belgium. Coniferous forest (two plots Pinus sylvestris and two plots Pinus nigra) received significantly higher nitrogen and sulphur throughfall deposition than deciduous forest and heathland. Grassed and pure heathland had significantly highest throughfall quantities of Ca(2+) and Mg(2+), respectively. The observed differences in throughfall deposition between the different vegetation types were not univocally reflected in the ion seepage flux. Considerable seepage fluxes of NO(3)(-), SO(4)(2-), Ca(2+) and Al(III) were only found under the P. nigra plots. We discuss our hypothesis that the P. nigra forests already evolved to a situation of N saturation, while the other vegetation types did not. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:month | May | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:issn | 0269-7491 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MertensJJ | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:JanssenNN | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:De... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:AugustoLL | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:VerheyenKK | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:WuytsKK | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:StaelensJJ | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:Van... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GielisLL | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GeudensGG | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:volume | 153 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:pagination | 295-303 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17942204... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:year | 2008 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:articleTitle | Effect of vegetation type on throughfall deposition and seepage flux. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:affiliation | Laboratory of Forestry, Ghent University, Geraardsbergse Steenweg 267, 9090 Gontrode, Belgium. an.deschrijver@ugent.be | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17942204 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
