| pubmed-article:1790172 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0025663 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0086045 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0040085 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0441655 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0680730 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0014441 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1148554 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:issue | 5 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:dateCreated | 1992-4-2 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:abstractText | The determination of enzyme levels in cellular extracts by active site titrations or by catalytic activity measurements is relevant in both science and medicine. However, these techniques assume that enzymes exhibit the same response in crude sample matrices as they do in the purified state. We report here an example of how an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to determine the true enzyme concentration which was compared to the effective enzyme concentration obtained by ligand binding and catalytic assay methods in a crude bacterial cell extract. Rabbit antibodies specific for Lactobacillus casei thymidylate synthase (TS) were used to develop a highly specific and sensitive heterogeneous noncompetitive ELISA assay with a typical detection limit of 1.4 fmol of TS (100 pg) and a dynamic working range of 3 orders of magnitude. The antibodies showed identical responses for TS, its inhibitory binary complex with 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridylate, and its inhibitory ternary complex with 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridylate and 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate in the immunoassay. L. casei cell-free extracts were subjected to extraction with CM-Sephadex and the various fractions were analyzed by ELISA, active-site titrations, and catalytic assays which demonstrated that assays which assumed full catalytic or ligand-binding competence underestimated the true enzyme level. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:grant | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:grant | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:issn | 1043-1802 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:DunlapR BRB | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:TollesonW HWH | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:CisnerosR JRJ | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:AlibhaiMM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:volume | 2 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:pagination | 327-32 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2007-11-14 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1790172-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1790172-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1790172-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1790172-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1790172-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1790172-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1790172-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:1790172-... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:articleTitle | Comparison of ELISA with activity and ligand-binding methods for the determination of thymidylate synthase concentration. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Chemistry, University of South Carolina, Columbia 29208. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:1790172 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. | lld:pubmed |
