Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:17849871rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0330502lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17849871lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220806lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17849871lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0016228lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17849871lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021576lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17849871lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009276lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17849871lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17849871lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1001499lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:dateCreated2007-9-13lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:abstractTextStudies were done comparing the insecticides SpinTor (spinosad), BotaniGard (Beauveria bassiana), Neemix (azadirachtin), and Surround (kaolin, a clay) with conventional chemical insecticides Capture (bifenthrin) and Helix XTra (thiamethoxam), all applied at seven rates in a 7-d assay to assess their impact on adult crucifer flea beetle, Phyllotreta cruciferae (Goeze) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Lethal time (LT) required for 25, 50, and 75% mortality (LT25, LT50, and LT75) and relative potencies for the insecticide concentration groupings (0, 1X-1.5X, and 2X- 4X) were estimated for each treatment by using survival functions. P. cruciferae mortality increased in response to increasing concentrations, especially for Helix XTra, Capture and SpinTor. After 2 d of exposure in 2002, mortality ranged from 54 to 78% for Helix XTra, from 60 to 94% for Capture, and from 66 to 92% for SpinTor across concentrations. In 2003, flea beetle mortality ranged from 37 to 60%, from 29 to 63%, and from 23 to 52% on exposure to Helix XTra, Capture, and SpinTor, respectively, for 2 d. The LT50 and relative potencies of the insecticides were in the order of Helix XTra, Capture, and SpinTor > BotaniGard, Neemix, and Surround. In 2002, LT50 values were 1 and 2 d for Capture and SpinTor, 2 d for BotaniGard, and 3 d for Neemix and Surround. In 2003, LT50 values occurred between 2 and 4 d after exposure to Helix XTra, Capture, and SpinTor, with LT50 values of 5-7 d on exposure to BotaniGard, Neemix, and Surround. SpinTor seems to be a suitable ecorational insecticide in canola, Brassica napus L., for P. cruciferae management.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:monthAuglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:issn0022-0493lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OlsonD LDLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AntwiF BFBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CareyD RDRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:volume100lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:pagination1201-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17849871...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17849871...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17849871...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17849871...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17849871...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17849871...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17849871...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17849871...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17849871...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:year2007lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:articleTitleComparisons of ecorational and chemical insecticides against crucifer flea beetle (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) on canola.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA. frank.antwi@montana.edulld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17849871pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed