Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1777912rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777912lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031327lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777912lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0019134lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777912lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1148561lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777912lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1533691lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777912lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2930749lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:dateCreated1992-3-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:abstractTextNonionic radiographic contrast media are used frequently in diagnostic and interventional angiography. However, there is concern that they may possess thrombogenic properties, and some studies have suggested that patients receiving nonionic contrast media are difficult to systemically anticoagulate with intravenous heparin. To investigate the potential effects of nonionic contrast media on systemic anticoagulation during diagnostic cardiac catheterization, pharmacokinetics and in vitro anticoagulant activity following a 3,000 U intravenous heparin bolus were assessed in 12 patients assigned randomly to either an ionic or a nonionic contrast agent. Independent of contrast agent, all patients exhibited biphasic (nonlinear) heparin pharmacokinetics characterized by an initial rapid disappearance phase, followed by a second slower phase. Each patient achieved a therapeutic plasma heparin concentration (greater than or equal to 0.2 U/ml) within 10 min of receiving the bolus, and maintained this level throughout the procedure. Heparin anticoagulant activity, as estimated by a standard activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) was not affected differently by nonionic as compared with ionic contrast media (p greater than 0.05). Each patient rapidly achieved a level of systemic anticoagulation commonly considered therapeutic (APTT greater than or equal to 1.5 times the control), and maintained this level throughout the procedure. In both groups, APTT correlated directly with plasma heparin concentration (r = 0.95; p less than 0.0001), and inversely with the total amount of contrast media used during the procedure (r = -0.25; p = 0.01). Plasma heparin concentration did not correlate with total contrast media (r = -0.16; p greater than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:issn0008-6312lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TracyRRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ClyneCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LeuPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WeinerB HBHlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BovillE GEGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BeckerR CRClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CorraoJ MJMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HaugeKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BallS PSPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:volume79lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:pagination31-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777912-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777912-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777912-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777912-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777912-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777912-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777912-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777912-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777912-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777912-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777912-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:articleTitleHeparin pharmacokinetics and in vitro anticoagulant activity in patients receiving nonionic radiographic contrast media.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:affiliationThrombosis Research Center, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777912pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed