Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1777349rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777349lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005767lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777349lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0155668lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777349lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522564lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777349lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777349lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1509144lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777349lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040399lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777349lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0337051lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777349lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0303322lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:dateCreated1992-3-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:abstractTextWe evaluated one of the merits of ECG-gated thallium-201 single photon emission computed tomography (g-T1 SPECT), i.e., the ability to appreciate left ventricular (LV) wall motion. LV wall motion assessed by g-T1 SPECT and by ECG-gated Blood Pool SPECT (g-BP SPECT) was classified into three grades and compared segment by segment. T1-201 uptake by g-T1 SPECT was also classified into three grades and compared with those of wall motion in g-BP SPECT. Fifty patients with prior myocardial infarction were injected intravenously at rest with 111 to 185 M Bq (3 to 5 mCi) of Tl-201. The left ventricular regions were divided into anterior, septal, inferior and lateral segments (50 patients X 4 segments = 200 segments in total). The grades of wall motion and Tl-201 uptake detected by g-Tl SPECT correlated well with those of wall motion in g-BP SPECT (94.5% and 85%, respectively). With g-Tl SPECT it was possible to evaluate left ventricular wall motion, providing clear perfusion images.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:monthJullld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:issn0914-7187lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LUNTM RMRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FujiwaraYYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MuraseKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TanadaSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HamamotoKKlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MiyagawaMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:authorpubmed-author:IioAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TauxeW NWNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MochizukiTTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:volume5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:pagination47-51lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777349-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777349-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777349-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777349-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777349-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777349-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777349-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777349-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777349-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777349-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777349-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777349-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1777349-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:articleTitleECG-gated thallium-201 myocardial SPECT in patients with old myocardial infarction compared with ECG-gated blood pool SPECT.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:affiliationEhime University School of Medicine, Department of Radiology, Japan.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1777349pubmed:publicationTypeCase Reportslld:pubmed