Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:17643870rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0038586lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17643870lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0021822lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17643870lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0025663lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17643870lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0241889lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17643870lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0033105lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17643870lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0439851lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17643870lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0750572lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17643870lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0680240lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17643870lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1552596lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17643870lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1947931lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:issue1-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:dateCreated2007-12-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:abstractTextFamily studies typically use multiple sources of information on each individual including direct interviews and family history information. The aims of the present study were to: (1) assess agreement for diagnoses of specific substance use disorders between direct interviews and the family history method; (2) compare prevalence estimates according to the two methods; (3) test strategies to approximate prevalence estimates according to family history reports to those based on direct interviews; (4) determine covariates of inter-informant agreement; and (5) identify covariates that affect the likelihood of reporting disorders by informants.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:issn0376-8716lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BessonJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FerreroFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RotherWWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FleischmannAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:authorpubmed-author:JeanprêtreNNlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PreisigMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AyetGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GammaFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VandeleurC...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LustenbergerY...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SisbaneFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:day1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:volume92lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:pagination9-19lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17643870...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:year2008lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:articleTitleInter-informant agreement and prevalence estimates for substance use disorders: direct interview versus family history method.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Psychiatry, University Hospital of Geneva, Chemin du Petit Bel-Air 2, 1225 Chêne-Bourg, Switzerland. Vandeleur@hcuge.chlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17643870pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:17643870lld:pubmed