Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:17629164rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042232lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17629164lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1522570lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17629164lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0085174lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17629164lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0259787lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17629164lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17629164lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17629164lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705313lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17629164lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1515273lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:dateCreated2007-7-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:abstractTextTo compare the effects of 50 microg of vaginal misoprostol with 25 microg for labor induction at term.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:issn0390-6663lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KuschPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:authorpubmed-author:YanikFFlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ErogluDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OktemMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:volume34lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:pagination102-5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17629164...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17629164...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17629164...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17629164...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17629164...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17629164...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17629164...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17629164...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17629164...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17629164...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17629164...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17629164...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:year2007lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:articleTitleLabor induction at term: a comparison of the effects of 50 microg and 25 microg vaginal misoprostol.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baskent University, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:publicationTypeClinical Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17629164pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed