| pubmed-article:17538397 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0031268 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0439655 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1511726 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0018017 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1707455 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0032743 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1442989 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1571702 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C2348043 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0450363 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:issue | 7 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2007-5-31 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:abstractText | The relative advantage of fully 3-D versus 2-D mode for whole-body imaging is currently the focus of considerable expert debate. The nature of 3-D PET acquisition for FDG PET/CT theoretically allows a shorter scan time and improved efficiency of FDG use than in the standard 2-D acquisition. We therefore objectively and subjectively compared standard 2-D and fully 3-D reconstructed data for FDG PET/CT on a research PET/CT system. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:month | Jul | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:issn | 0143-3636 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:StrobelKlausK | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BurgerCyrillC | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:HanyThomas... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:TreyerValerie... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:Veit-HaibachP... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:RüdyMatthiasM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:volume | 28 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:pagination | 555-9 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:17538397... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:year | 2007 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:articleTitle | Objective and subjective comparison of standard 2-D and fully 3-D reconstructed data on a PET/CT system. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:affiliation | Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland. klaus.strobel@usz.ch | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:17538397 | pubmed:publicationType | Evaluation Studies | lld:pubmed |
