Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1749470rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0024090lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1749470lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0596545lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1749470lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0206080lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1749470lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0868928lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1749470lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205265lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1749470lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1555582lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:dateCreated1992-1-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:abstractTextSince November 1988, 28 patients with lumbar L5 radiculopathy refractory to conservative care and with a radiologically verified central or mediolateral disc herniation at the level of L4/L5 had had a percutaneous discectomy. Radiological verification consisted of spinal CT +/- myelography, +/- myelo-CT, +/- MRI. A short-term follow-up analysis of at least 2 months taking the clinical and functional status as well as the professional reintegration into account revealed a 64.3% (18/28 patients) satisfactory outcome and a 32.1% (10/28 patients) failure rate. Of the latter 28.6% (8/28 patients) required further open surgery. One patient whose pain had only partially in regressed was shown at open operation to have a sequestered cranial prolapse as revealed by spinal CT after the percutaneous procedure. There were no major complications. One patient developed a sequestered extraforaminal herniation through the nucleotomy canal three weeks after the procedure. One patient bled for 2 minutes. There were no major vessel injuries. One patient reported local muscular pain, and enhanced nerve root pain after introduction of the trocar sleeve.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:issn0028-3940lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CasparWWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:authorpubmed-author:FaubertCClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:volume33lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:pagination407-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:dateRevised2011-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1749470-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1749470-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1749470-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1749470-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1749470-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1749470-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1749470-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1749470-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1749470-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1749470-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1749470-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1749470-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1749470-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:articleTitleLumbar percutaneous discectomy. Initial experience in 28 cases.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:affiliationNeuroradiological Institute, University of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Federal Republic of Germany.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1749470pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed