Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:17424321rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0035204lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17424321lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0230445lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17424321lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1261322lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17424321lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0681024lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17424321lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521738lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:issue11lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:dateCreated2010-6-28lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:abstractTextA trial involving 512 beef calves was conducted in a commercial research feedlot to determine the effect of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) on performance parameters and carcass characteristics. Two hundred and fifty-six calves that were deemed to be "sick" (S) from BRD were allocated to 16 pens and 256 calves that were considered to be "well" (W) were allocated to another 16 pens. The outcome variables that were measured included average daily gain (ADG), daily dry matter intake (DDMI), dry matter intake to gain ratio (DM:G), BRD treatment rate, death loss, carcass traits, and net profit per pen.The data were partitioned into several time intervals including processing (P) to day -1, day 0 to day 27, day 28 to day 55, day 56 to day 83, day 84 to day 111, day 112 to day 139, day 140 to slaughter, day 0 to slaughter (0-Slaugh), and processing to slaughter (P-Slaugh). However, the most important interval was from processing to slaughter.For the interval P-Slaugh, there were no significant (p>/=0.05) differences between the S and W groups with respect to ADG and DM:G. Also, for the interval 0-Slaugh, the DDMI was similar for both groups. There were no significant (p>/=0.05) differences between the S and W groups for carcass weight, average fat, grade fat, rib eye area, marbling score, cutability estimate, or carcass grade distribution.The BRD treatment rates in the S and W groups were 6.6% and 4.7%, respectively. The mortality rates in the S and W groups were 0.78% and 0.39%, respectively. Also, there were no deaths attributable to BRD in either group.In the economic model, there was no significant (p>/=0.05) difference between the S and W groups with respect to net profit per pen.We conclude that this trial did not validate the concept that BRD impacts performance parameters, because a sufficient disease challenge was not present. However, this study provides several observations that will enhance the experimental design of future studies that attempt to quantify the total economic impact of BRD.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:statusPubMed-not-MEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:monthNovlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:issn0008-5286lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CoxM CMClld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BookerC WCWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RibbleC SCSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GuichonP TPTlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ThorlaksonB...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:volume34lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:pagination668-73lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:dateRevised2010-9-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:articleTitleA field investigation of the economic impact of respiratory disease in feedlot calves.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17424321pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:17424321lld:pubmed