Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:17252932rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280551lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17252932lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0040186lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17252932lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1527245lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17252932lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0733755lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17252932lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17252932lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0001272lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17252932lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2603343lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17252932lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705994lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17252932lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0220784lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17252932lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1513492lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:dateCreated2007-1-26lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:abstractTextThis study has been carried out to determine the effect of neutral position, hyperextension and hyperflexion of the tarsal joint on the tibial nerve, motor action potential latency and tarsal canal compartment pressure in dogs with the aid of electrophysiological and anatomical methods. Totally twenty healthy mongrel dogs were used. Latency of motor nerve action potential (MNAPL) studies of tibial nerve via surface stimulating and needle recording electrodes was performed on right hind limbs of all the dogs. The compartment pressures of the tarsal canal with the pressure transducer were determined from both limbs from ten of the dogs. In one dog, tarsal regions of both left and right limbs were demonstrated using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Two dogs were euthanatized and tarsal regions of the dogs were sectioned for correlative anatomy. Nerve conduction studies showed that the MNAP latency of the tibial nerve were 3.55 +/- 0.097 ms, 3.76 +/- 0.087 ms and 3.39 +/- 0.097 ms in neutral, hyperextension and hyperflexion positions, respectively. Hyperflexion of the tarsal joint caused prolongation of the MNAP latency of the tibial nerve with the highest pressure value being determined in tarsal canal. From the anatomical viewpoint, the distance between the flexor hallucis longus muscle and the superficial digital muscle was the shortest during hyperflexion and the plantar branch of saphenous artery, lateral and medial plantar nerves located more laterally in cadaver and MR imaging sections. As a result of this study, it is thought that tarsal region diseases as well as long time splint in the hyperflexion position as applied in the Ehmer sling can affect the compartment pressure and nerve tension because of occupying in the tarsal canal. Raising pressure and nerve stretching in the tarsal canal compartment could cause deficiencies in the conduction velocity of the tibial nerve. This might be a result of tarsal tunnel syndrome in the dog. Clinicians could consider this syndrome in cases of tarsal region diseases as well as application of long time splint in hyperflexion of tarsal joints in dogs.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:issn0341-6593lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TuranEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:authorpubmed-author:OmerogluAAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BolukbasiOOlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:volume114lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:pagination20-4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:dateRevised2007-7-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17252932...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17252932...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17252932...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17252932...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17252932...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17252932...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17252932...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17252932...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17252932...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17252932...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17252932...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17252932...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:year2007lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:articleTitleThe effect of the tarsal joint positions on the tibial nerve motor action potential latency in dog: electrophysiological and anatomical studies.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:affiliationAdnan Menderes University, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Anatomy, Aydin, Turkey. eturan@adu.edu.trlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17252932pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed