Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:17093225rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0042153lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17093225lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0039005lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17093225lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17093225lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1442080lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17093225lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0204695lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17093225lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0443288lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17093225lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0332282lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:issue12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:dateCreated2006-11-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:abstractTextAn experiment was carried out to evaluate the metabolic utilization of energy in crossbred barrows during feed restriction and subsequent refeeding. Ten pigs, initially weighing 52 kg, were used in 5 blocks of 2 littermates each. A 7-d adaptation period (P1) was used in which pigs were offered feed at 2.60 MJ of ME.kg of BW(-0.60).d(-1). This adaptation period was followed by a 7-d period (P2), in which 1 pig of each block continued to receive feed at the same level of feeding, whereas for its littermate a 40% reduction in feed intake was imposed (i.e., 1.55 MJ of ME.kg of BW(-0.60).d(-1)). During the subsequent 7-d period (P3), both pigs were offered feed at 2.60 MJ of ME.kg of BW(-0.60).d(-1). After P3, pigs were fasted for 1 d. Heat production (HP) was measured for all pigs during the last 3 d of P1 and on all days for P2 and P3. Heat production was measured using an open-circuit respiration chamber. Energy and N balances were determined for P1, P2, and P3. The HP was partitioned into HP due to physical activity, the short-term thermic effect of feeding, and resting HP. Feed restriction during P2 decreased (P < 0.01) total HP, resting HP, short-term thermic effect of feeding, and retained energy, whereas HP due to physical activity was not affected by feed restriction (P = 0.50). Likewise, fecal and urinary N loss, protein gain, lipid gain, and ADG were reduced during feed restriction (P < 0.01). There were no differences in components of HP and metabolic utilization of energy between the 2 groups during P1 and P3. Nevertheless, urinary N loss was decreased (P < 0.05) and ADG increased (P < 0.01) during P3 for pigs that were restricted in P2. Compensatory growth after a period of feed restriction does not seem to be related to a change in the metabolic utilization of energy for gain but more likely is due to gain in water and gut contents.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:issn1525-3163lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SauvantDDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:authorpubmed-author:DuboisSSlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NobletJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:authorpubmed-author:van MilgenJJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LovattoP APAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:volume84lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:pagination3329-36lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:dateRevised2008-11-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17093225...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17093225...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17093225...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17093225...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17093225...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17093225...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17093225...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17093225...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17093225...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:year2006lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:articleTitleEffects of feed restriction and subsequent refeeding on energy utilization in growing pigs.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:affiliationUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria, Departamento de Zootecnia, Santa Maria, RS 97105-900, Brazil. lovatto@smail.ufsm.brlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17093225pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed