| pubmed-article:17076829 | pubmed:abstractText | In traditional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, there is a subset of patients complaining of knee instability, especially rotational instability, and athletes not able to return to their preinjury level of sports activity. Currently, controversy exists over the usefulness of the double bundle technique (DBT) in addressing these problems. In order to evaluate the DBT, we completed a literature review from 1969 to February 2006 focusing on anatomy, magnetic resonance imaging, graft incorporation, biomechanics, kinematics, surgical techniques, complications and outcome. The DBT is not a standardized technique, which makes it difficult to compare results. Cadaver studies have proven biomechanical advantages with respect to ap-stability, but assessing the rotational stability remains difficult. There is a lack of available outcome studies with sufficient follow-up to demonstrate the potential advantages of DBT. The theoretical advantages of DBT require careful evaluation with outcome, biomechanical and kinematic studies. In addition, studies are needed to address issues such as graft incorporation and complications. An advantage offered by DBT is the possibility to identify rupture patterns that can lead to surgical preservation of an intact and augmentation of an injured bundle. The approach of augmentating a single bundle technique reconstruction with adequate anterior-posterior but poor rotational stability is promising. | lld:pubmed |
