Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1705338rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1705338lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205102lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1705338lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0036043lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1705338lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0013778lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1705338lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0699733lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1705338lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0199548lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1705338lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0994894lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1705338lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1706366lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:dateCreated1991-4-1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:abstractTextPlacement of prophylactic epicardial defibrillation patches at time of open-heart surgery in patients at risk for postoperative arrhythmias has been strongly questioned. Concern has centered on the ability to safely perform subsequent external defibrillation if needed. From 61 patients who were treated with a two-stage strategy we identified 17 who, while wearing epicardial patches and no generator, received external cardioversion/defibrillation for 20 episodes of hemodynamically unstable ventricular arrhythmias. All the patients had one small and one large patch. Eighteen of the episodes were induced during electrophysiological testing (with transthoracic shocks delivered via pad electrodes oriented in an apex-posterior configuration) and two were spontaneous. The episodes occurred at 21 +/- 27 days from patch implant. Thirteen episodes (65%) were converted with one shock at an energy level of 185 +/- 65 J. Seven (35%) required a second shock at 351 +/- 22 J. The accumulated energy requirement was 286 +/- 205 J. No adverse outcomes were noted. The number of episodes requiring more than one shock and the energy requirements were not different from those in a control group of 20 similar arrhythmias treated with the same equipment. Under these conditions, external cardioversion/defibrillation in patients with one large and one small epicardial defibrillation patch was uniformly successful. Further data is needed in the out-of-hospital setting and on the results of external defibrillation in patients with two large patches.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:issn0147-8389lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MaloneyJ DJDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:authorpubmed-author:TrohmanR GRGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PinskiS LSLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ArnoldA ZAZlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MidaPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:volume14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:pagination7-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:dateRevised2004-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1705338-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:year1991lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:articleTitleSafety of external cardioversion/defibrillation in patients with internal defibrillation patches and no device.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1705338pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed