Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:17016190rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0002903lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17016190lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034656lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17016190lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0443315lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17016190lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205095lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17016190lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0443349lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17016190lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0028778lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17016190lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1883674lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17016190lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:issue5lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:dateCreated2006-10-3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:abstractTextTwo commonly used methods of digital nerve block with local anesthetic are the two-injection dorsal technique and the single-injection volar subcutaneous technique. The authors compared these two digital block techniques with respect to local anesthetic injection pain and recipient preference of anesthetic technique.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:citationSubsetAIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:issn1529-4242lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WilliamsJason...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:authorpubmed-author:LalondeDonald...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:issnTypeElectroniclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:volume118lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:pagination1195-200lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:dateRevised2011-2-16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17016190...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17016190...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17016190...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17016190...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17016190...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17016190...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17016190...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17016190...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17016190...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17016190...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17016190...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:17016190...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:year2006lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:articleTitleRandomized comparison of the single-injection volar subcutaneous block and the two-injection dorsal block for digital anesthesia.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:affiliationDivision of Plastic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada E2L 4L2.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:17016190pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed