Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1699426rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1882854lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1699426lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0007292lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1699426lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0017742lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1699426lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0178666lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1699426lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1516240lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1699426lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1550605lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1699426lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0456205lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:issue4 Pt 1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:dateCreated1990-11-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:abstractTextThe relationships among fiber type, glucose transporter (GLUT-4) protein content, and glucose transport activity stimulated maximally with insulin and/or contractile activity were studied by use of the rat epitrochlearis (15% type I-20% type II2a-65% type IIb), soleus (84-16-0%), extensor digitorum longus (EDL, 3-57-40%), and flexor digitorum brevis (FDB, 7-92-1%) muscles. Insulin-stimulated 2-deoxy-D-glucose (2-DG) uptake was greatest in the soleus, followed (in order) by the FDB, EDL, and epitrochlearis. On the other hand, contractile activity induced the greatest increase in 2-DG uptake in the FDB, followed by the EDL, soleus, and epitrochlearis. The effects of insulin and contractile activity on 2-DG uptake were additive in all the muscle preparations, with the relative rates being FDB greater than soleus greater than EDL greater than epitrochlearis. Quantitation of the GLUT-4 protein content with the antiserum R820 showed the following pattern: FDB greater than soleus greater than EDL greater than epitrochlearis. Linear regression analysis showed that whereas a relatively low and nonsignificant correlation existed between GLUT-4 protein content and 2-DG uptake stimulated by insulin alone, significant correlations existed between GLUT-4 protein content and 2-DG uptake stimulated either by contractions alone (r = 0.950) or by insulin and contractions in combination (r = 0.992). These results suggest that the differences in maximally stimulated glucose transport activity among the three fiber types may be related to differences in their content of GLUT-4 protein.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:granthttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:monthOctlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:issn0002-9513lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HolloszyJ OJOlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KoranyiLLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PermuttM AMAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BoureyR ERElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HenriksenE...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:authorpubmed-author:RodnickK JKJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:volume259lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:paginationE593-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:dateRevised2011-11-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1699426-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:year1990lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:articleTitleGlucose transporter protein content and glucose transport capacity in rat skeletal muscles.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:publicationTypeIn Vitrolld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1699426pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1699426lld:pubmed