Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:16812682rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0012632lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16812682lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0597198lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16812682lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1704632lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16812682lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1280500lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16812682lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0871261lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16812682lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0178826lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16812682lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0234402lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16812682lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C2911692lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16812682lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1706817lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16812682lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521828lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16812682lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705241lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16812682lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1701901lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16812682lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1705242lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:issue1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:dateCreated2010-6-29lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:abstractTextIn a discrete-trial conditional discrimination procedure, 4 pigeons obtained food reinforcers by pecking a key with a short latency on trials signaled by one stimulus and by pecking the same key with a long latency on trials signaled by a second stimulus. The physical difference between the two stimuli and the temporal separation between the latency values required for reinforcement were varied factorially over four sets of conditions, and the ratio of reinforcer rates for short and long latencies was varied within each set of conditions. Stimulus discrimination varied directly with both stimulus and response differences and was unaffected by the reinforcer ratio. Sensitivity to reinforcement, estimated by generalized-matching-law fits to the data within each set of conditions, varied directly with the response difference but inversely with the stimulus difference arranged between sets of conditions. Because variations in stimulus differences, response differences, and reinforcer differences did not have equivalent effects, these findings question the functional equivalence of the three terms of the discriminated operant: antecedent stimuli, behavior, and consequences.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:statusPubMed-not-MEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:monthJanlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:issn0022-5002lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NevinJ AJAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:authorpubmed-author:AlsopBBlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CasuGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:volume59lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:pagination147-61lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:dateRevised2010-9-14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:year1993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:articleTitleEffects of differences between stimuli, responses, and reinforcer rates on conditional discrimination performance.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16812682pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16812682lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16812682lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16812682lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16812682lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16812682lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16812682lld:pubmed