| pubmed-article:16808108 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0087111 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0332307 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205148 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0678599 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0018027 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0297827 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:issue | 2 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2006-6-30 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:abstractText | Cylinders of Type III gold alloy were sandblasted with either: 50 micron Aluminium Oxide particles (Group 1); CoJet Sand (Group 2); the CoJet System - CoJet Sand followed by application of silane primer (Group 3). Shear testing was undertaken following apposition of Panavia 21 resin. Mean shear bond strengths (+/- standard deviation) were Group 1, 32.9 (+/-18.2) MPa; Group 2, 26.5 (+/-10.8) MPa and Group 3, 45.6 (+/- 25.8) MPa. There was no statistically difference between Group 1 and 2; and between group 1 and 3. However, there was a significant; difference between Group 2 and 3 p < 0.05). While the CoJet System achieved the highest mean shear bond strength it conveyed no statistical advantage over the traditional method of sandblasting with aluminium oxide. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:citationSubset | D | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:month | Jun | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:issn | 0965-7452 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MolesDavid... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:StokesAlastai... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:GillDaljit... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:TredwinChrist... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:AzizAzwatee... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:volume | 14 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:pagination | 73-8 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16808108... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16808108... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16808108... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16808108... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16808108... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16808108... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16808108... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16808108... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16808108... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16808108... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16808108... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16808108... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16808108... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:year | 2006 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:articleTitle | Influence of surface treatments on the shear bond strength of Panavia 21 to a Type III gold alloy. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:affiliation | UCL Eastman Dental Institute, University College London. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16808108 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
