Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:16674974rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0033684lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16674974lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205245lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16674974lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0023745lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16674974lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0683579lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:dateCreated2006-6-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:abstractTextIdentifying potential protein interactions is of great importance in understanding the topologies of cellular networks, which is much needed and valued in current systematic biological studies. The development of our computational methods to predict protein-protein interactions have been spurred on by the massive sequencing efforts of the genomic revolution. Among these methods is phylogenetic profiling, which assumes that proteins under similar evolutionary pressures with similar phylogenetic profiles might be functionally related. Here, we introduce a method for inferring functional linkages between proteins from their evolutionary scenarios. The term evolutionary scenario refers to a series of events that occurred in speciation over time, which can be reconstructed given a phylogenetic profile and a species tree. Common evolutionary pressures on two proteins can then be inferred by comparing their evolutionary scenarios, which is a direct indication of their functional linkage. This scenario method has proven to have better performance compared with the classical phylogenetic profile method, when applied to the same test set. In addition, predicted results of the two methods are found to be fairly different, suggesting the possibility of merging them in order to achieve a better performance. We analyzed the influence of the topology of the phylogenetic tree on the performance of this method, and found it to be robust to perturbations in the topology of the tree. However, if a completely random tree is incorporated, performance will decline significantly. The evolutionary scenario method was used for inferring functional linkages in 67 species, and 40,006 linkages were predicted. We examine our prediction for budding yeast and find that almost all predicted linkages are supported by further evidence.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:issn0022-2836lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:authorpubmed-author:XXXlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ZhouYunYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:authorpubmed-author:WangRuiRlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:authorpubmed-author:XiaXuefengXlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SunZhirongZlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:day16lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:volume359lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:pagination1150-9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16674974...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16674974...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16674974...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16674974...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:year2006lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:articleTitleInferring functional linkages between proteins from evolutionary scenarios.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:affiliationMOE Key Laboratory of Bioinformatics, State Key Laboratory of Biomembrane and Membrane Biotechnology, Department of Biology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16674974pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16674974lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16674974lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16674974lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16674974lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16674974lld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:16674974lld:pubmed