Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:16541308rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0006141lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16541308lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0796693lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16541308lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521761lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16541308lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0475264lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16541308lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205390lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16541308lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1521828lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16541308lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0231175lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16541308lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1519941lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16541308lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0376648lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16541308lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0392760lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:issue2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:dateCreated2006-8-23lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:abstractTextDespite the widespread application of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for early stage breast cancer, there is a wide variation in reported test performance characteristics. A major aim of this prospective multicentre validation study was to quantify detection and false-negative rates of SLNB and evaluate factors influencing them.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:monthSeplld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:issn0167-6806lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NewcombeRober...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ManselRobert...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:authorpubmed-author:GoyalAmitAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ALMANAC...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChhabraAlokAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:volume99lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:pagination203-8lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16541308...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:year2006lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:articleTitleFactors affecting failed localisation and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer--results of the ALMANAC validation phase.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Surgery, Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:publicationTypeRandomized Controlled Triallld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:publicationTypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'tlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:publicationTypeMulticenter Studylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16541308pubmed:publicationTypeValidation Studieslld:pubmed