Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1629887rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0268790lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1629887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0005823lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1629887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0085580lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1629887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0034754lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1629887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0205554lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1629887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707455lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1629887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031082lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1629887lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0442603lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:dateCreated1992-8-17lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:abstractTextOffice blood pressures were compared with those obtained using a thirty minute recording with an automatic device (Dinamap) in thirty patients with essential hypertension and nineteen subjects with hypertension and renal artery stenosis. When matched for age and sex, no differences were found between both groups of patients with respect to their office or automatically recorded blood pressures. The difference between office and automatically assessed systolic blood pressures was similar in both groups. The difference in diastolic pressures was slightly larger in the group with renal artery stenosis. The number of patients showing a pressure drop greater than 10 mm Hg was comparable in the two groups. We conclude that blood pressure levels obtained in the office overestimate 'true' blood pressure not only in essential but also in renovascular hypertension.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:monthJunlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:issn0950-9240lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:authorpubmed-author:de LeeuwP WPWlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:authorpubmed-author:VreugdenhilGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SchreyGGlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:volume6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:pagination189-91lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:dateRevised2007-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1629887-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1629887-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1629887-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1629887-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1629887-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1629887-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1629887-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1629887-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1629887-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1629887-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1629887-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:year1992lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:articleTitleComparison of office and serial automatic blood pressure readings in renovascular and essential hypertension.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Internal Medicine, Zuiderziekenhuis, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1629887pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed