| pubmed-article:16266163 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0028263 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0597498 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0376249 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1709059 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1880177 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:issue | 4 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2005-11-3 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:abstractText | Cochlear implants allow most patients with profound deafness to successfully communicate under optimal listening conditions. However, the amplitude modulation (AM) information provided by most implants is not sufficient for speech recognition in realistic settings where noise is typically present. This study added slowly varying frequency modulation (FM) to the existing algorithm of an implant simulation and used competing sentences to evaluate FM contributions to speech recognition in noise. Potential FM advantage was evaluated as a function of the number of spectral bands, FM depth, FM rate, and FM band distribution. Barring floor and ceiling effects, significant improvement was observed for all bands from 1 to 32 with the additional FM cue both in quiet and noise. Performance also improved with greater FM depth and rate, which might reflect resolved sidebands under the FM condition. Having FM present in low-frequency bands was more beneficial than in high-frequency bands, and only half of the bands required the presence of FM, regardless of position, to achieve performance similar to when all bands had the FM cue. These results provide insight into the relative contributions of AM and FM to speech communication and the potential advantage of incorporating FM for cochlear implant signal processing. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:grant | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:grant | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:month | Oct | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:issn | 0001-4966 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ZengFan-GangF... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:NieKaibaoK | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:StickneyGinge... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:volume | 118 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:pagination | 2412-20 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2007-11-14 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16266163... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16266163... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16266163... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16266163... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16266163... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16266163... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16266163... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16266163... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16266163... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16266163... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:16266163... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:year | 2005 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:articleTitle | Contribution of frequency modulation to speech recognition in noise. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 364 Medical Surgery II, Irvine, California 92697-1275, USA. stickney@uci.edu | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:16266163 | pubmed:publicationType | Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:16266163 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:16266163 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:16266163 | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:16266163 | lld:pubmed |
