Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:16215748rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0030705lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16215748lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0441833lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16215748lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0233849lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:issue4lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:dateCreated2005-12-12lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:abstractTextThe aim of the present study was to investigate the psychobiological personality dimensions in two subgroups of patients with environmental illness (EI). Fifty-nine patients, 34 women and 25 men (aged 32-69 years), were referred for symptoms allegedly caused by abnormal sensitivity to either dental fillings (DF; n=26) or electromagnetic fields (EMF; n=33). For the evaluation of personality, the Swedish 238-item version of the Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) was used. Compared with a control group, the EMF group scored higher on the temperament dimension Persistence. The DF group scored higher on the TCI subscales Harm Avoidance (fatigability and asthenia) and Self-Directedness (self-acceptance). Women scored higher than men did on the Novelty Seeking and Reward Dependence (RD) dimensions in the DF group and on RD in the control group, indicating an inherited gender difference. No differences were found between men and women in the EMF group. Our results indicate that the high level of persistence found in the EMF group and the high level of fatigability and asthenia in combination with high self-acceptance found in the DF group represent vulnerable personalities. No significant differences were found between the two patient groups, indicating that these groups are quite similar regarding personality. This vulnerability can be expressed as various mental and somatic symptoms, which can be interpreted as EI symptoms by the affected individual.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:citationSubsetDlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:monthDeclld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:issn1432-6981lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BergdahlMaudMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:authorpubmed-author:BergdahlJanJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:authorpubmed-author:MårellLenaLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:authorpubmed-author:PerrisHjördis...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:volume9lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:pagination251-6lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:16215748...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:year2005lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:articleTitlePsychobiological personality dimensions in two environmental-illness patient groups.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:affiliationDepartment of Psychology, Umeå University, Umeå, 901 87, Sweden. jan.bergdahl@psy.umu.selld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16215748pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed