Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:1611514rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0026549lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1611514lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0597357lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1611514lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0814083lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1611514lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0243076lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1611514lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0392760lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:issue1-2lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:dateCreated1992-7-24lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:abstractTextIn the present study we have examined the interaction between the selective cholecystokinin (CCK)A and CCKB receptor antagonists, devazepide and L365-260 on morphine conditioned place preference (CPP). Using an unbiased procedure, morphine (1.5 mg/kg) produced a reliable CPP which was observed irrespective of the conditioning compartment type. Pretreatment with devazepide (0.001-0.01 mg/kg s.c.) produced a dose related attenuation of this response. At higher doses (0.1-1 mg/kg) this antagonism became variable and dependent on the training compartment with blockade only observed when conditioning was to the white/rough textured environment. This profile has also been reported for the serotonin (5-HT)3 receptor antagonist ondansetron. The CCKB antagonist L365-260 (0.000001-0.01 mg/kg) failed to antagonize the morphine CPP, if anything a mild potentiation was observed. To study this further we examined the interaction between L365-260 (0.01 mg/kg) and a subthreshold dose of morphine (0.3 mg/kg). At these doses neither drug elicited CPP, however when co-administered a significant CPP was recorded. Finally, L365-260 at 1 mg/kg induced a mild but significant CPP when administered alone. These results suggest a differential role of CCK receptor subtypes on reward-related behaviour and complement previous studies suggesting bimodal effects of CCK systems on mesolimbic dopamine function.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:commentsCorrectionshttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:monthFeblld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:issn0006-8993lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:authorpubmed-author:SellersE MEMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:authorpubmed-author:HigginsG AGAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:authorpubmed-author:NguyenPPlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:day14lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:volume572lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:pagination208-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:dateRevised2006-11-15lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1611514-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1611514-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1611514-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1611514-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1611514-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1611514-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1611514-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1611514-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1611514-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1611514-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1611514-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1611514-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:1611514-...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:year1992lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:articleTitleMorphine place conditioning is differentially affected by CCKA and CCKB receptor antagonists.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:affiliationClinical Psychopharmacology Program, Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed
pubmed-article:1611514pubmed:publicationTypeComparative Studylld:pubmed
http://linkedlifedata.com/r...pubmed:referesTopubmed-article:1611514lld:pubmed