Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:16089515rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0231239lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16089515lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1710082lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16089515lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1579762lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16089515lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0009491lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16089515lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449851lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16089515lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1510992lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16089515lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1707520lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16089515lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0936012lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:issue5 Pt 1lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:dateCreated2005-8-10lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:abstractTextDetrended fluctuation analysis (DFA) and detrended moving average (DMA) are two scaling analysis methods designed to quantify correlations in noisy nonstationary signals. We systematically study the performance of different variants of the DMA method when applied to artificially generated long-range power-law correlated signals with an a priori known scaling exponent alpha(0) and compare them with the DFA method. We find that the scaling results obtained from different variants of the DMA method strongly depend on the type of the moving average filter. Further, we investigate the optimal scaling regime where the DFA and DMA methods accurately quantify the scaling exponent alpha(0) , and how this regime depends on the correlations in the signal. Finally, we develop a three-dimensional representation to determine how the stability of the scaling curves obtained from the DFA and DMA methods depends on the scale of analysis, the order of detrending, and the order of the moving average we use, as well as on the type of correlations in the signal.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:statusPubMed-not-MEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:monthMaylld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:issn1539-3755lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:authorpubmed-author:IzuMMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:authorpubmed-author:ChenZhiZlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:authorpubmed-author:StanleyH...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:authorpubmed-author:IvanovPlamen...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:authorpubmed-author:CarboneAnnaAlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:authorpubmed-author:XuLimeiLlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:volume71lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:pagination051101lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:year2005lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:articleTitleQuantifying signals with power-law correlations: a comparative study of detrended fluctuation analysis and detrended moving average techniques.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:affiliationCenter for Polymer Studies and Department of Physics, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215, USA.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:16089515pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed