Statements in which the resource exists.
SubjectPredicateObjectContext
pubmed-article:15968418rdf:typepubmed:Citationlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0031268lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15968418lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0449468lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15968418lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0032743lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15968418lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0524865lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15968418lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C1947976lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15968418lifeskim:mentionsumls-concept:C0728938lld:lifeskim
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:issue3lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:dateCreated2005-6-21lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:abstractTextWe assess the influence of the reconstruction algorithms [OS-EM for the iterative one vs. a filtered back-projection in Fourier space (DiFT)] on partial volume correction in PET employing a fully 3D 3-compartment MR based PV-correction algorithm. The gray matter voxels in the PET image -- after removal of the white matter and cerebrospinal fluid contribution -- are corrected voxel-by-voxel using the image resolution.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:languageenglld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:journalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:citationSubsetIMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:chemicalhttp://linkedlifedata.com/r...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:statusMEDLINElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:issn0029-5566lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:authorpubmed-author:Rota KopsEElld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:authorpubmed-author:KrauseB JBJlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:issnTypePrintlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:volume44lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:ownerNLMlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:authorsCompleteYlld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:pagination99-106lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:dateRevised2011-8-25lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15968418...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15968418...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15968418...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15968418...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15968418...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15968418...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15968418...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:meshHeadingpubmed-meshheading:15968418...lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:year2005lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:articleTitleThe influence of filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction on partial volume correction in PET.lld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:affiliationInstitute of Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany. e.rota.kops@fz-juelich.delld:pubmed
pubmed-article:15968418pubmed:publicationTypeJournal Articlelld:pubmed