pubmed-article:15968418 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0031268 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:15968418 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0449468 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:15968418 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0032743 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:15968418 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0524865 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:15968418 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1947976 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:15968418 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0728938 | lld:lifeskim |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:issue | 3 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2005-6-21 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:abstractText | We assess the influence of the reconstruction algorithms [OS-EM for the iterative one vs. a filtered back-projection in Fourier space (DiFT)] on partial volume correction in PET employing a fully 3D 3-compartment MR based PV-correction algorithm. The gray matter voxels in the PET image -- after removal of the white matter and cerebrospinal fluid contribution -- are corrected voxel-by-voxel using the image resolution. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:issn | 0029-5566 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:Rota KopsEE | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:KrauseB JBJ | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:volume | 44 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:pagination | 99-106 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2011-8-25 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968418... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968418... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968418... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968418... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968418... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968418... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968418... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968418... | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:year | 2005 | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:articleTitle | The influence of filtered back-projection and iterative reconstruction on partial volume correction in PET. | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:affiliation | Institute of Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, 52425 Jülich, Germany. e.rota.kops@fz-juelich.de | lld:pubmed |
pubmed-article:15968418 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |