| pubmed-article:15968249 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0031809 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0000737 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0030274 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0543482 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0376443 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0039593 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0542341 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0439851 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0220825 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0439659 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0683941 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1552596 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205191 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1947931 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:issue | 1 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2005-6-21 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:abstractText | The diagnosis of "minimal change" chronic pancreatitis (MCCP) is often considered when conventional imaging studies are unrevealing in a patient population with abdominal pain of presumed pancreatic origin. Direct pancreatic function testing using secretin as a secretagogue (ST) has been considered the most sensitive method to diagnose MCCP but is not widely available to clinicians. Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) allows detailed imaging of pancreatic architecture, but the sensitivity and specificity for MCCP remain to be determined. We sought to compare the accuracy of EUS and ST in patients with presumed MCCP. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:month | Jul | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:issn | 1536-4828 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BhutaniManoop... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:MishraGirishG | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ForsmarkChris... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ToskesPhillip... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:ChowdhuryRiaz... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:issnType | Electronic | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:volume | 31 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:pagination | 63-8 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2006-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968249... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968249... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968249... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968249... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968249... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968249... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968249... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968249... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968249... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968249... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968249... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968249... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968249... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15968249... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:year | 2005 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:articleTitle | Comparative analysis of direct pancreatic function testing versus morphological assessment by endoscopic ultrasonography for the evaluation of chronic unexplained abdominal pain of presumed pancreatic origin. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0214, USA. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15968249 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15968249 | lld:pubmed |
