| pubmed-article:15962696 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0678723 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0175659 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1705994 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0035036 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0349674 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205232 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C1513492 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0458003 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0222045 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:issue | 1 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2005-6-20 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:abstractText | This study examined the test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, convergent validity and discriminant validity of the Fine Motor Scale of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-second edition (PDMS-FM-2). Participants included two groups of 18 children between the ages of 4 and 5 years with and without mild fine motor problems. The PDMS-FM-2 was administered twice to 12 children and rated by two occupational therapists. The PDMS-FM-2 results were compared with scores on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC). In addition, the scores of the children with and without fine motor problems were compared. For the test-retest reliability and the inter-rater reliability, correlation coefficients varied from r = 0.84 to r = 0.99. These results suggest that PDMS-FM-2 has excellent test-retest and inter-rater reliability. Convergent validity with the fine motor section of the M-ABC and discriminant validity have been confirmed. Only 39% of the children in the group with problems in fine motor activities had fine motor problems according to the PDMS-FM-2. This finding seems to indicate that the PDMS-FM-2 may not be sensitive enough for this population. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:issn | 0966-7903 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:OostendorpRob... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:CupEdith H... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:van... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:volume | 12 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:pagination | 1-13 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15962696... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15962696... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15962696... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15962696... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15962696... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15962696... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15962696... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15962696... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15962696... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15962696... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15962696... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15962696... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15962696... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:year | 2005 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:articleTitle | Reliability and validity of the fine motor scale of the Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Occupational Therapy, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. M.vanHartingsveldt@ergo.umcn.nl | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15962696 | pubmed:publicationType | Clinical Trial | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15962696 | lld:pubmed |
