| pubmed-article:15953980 | rdf:type | pubmed:Citation | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0920317 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0008300 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0332157 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0684321 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0449820 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0033213 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0085973 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | lifeskim:mentions | umls-concept:C0205214 | lld:lifeskim |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:issue | 4 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:dateCreated | 2005-6-14 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:abstractText | Reporting categorical relative risk estimates for a series of exposure levels versus a common reference category is a widespread practice. In meta-analysis, categorical regression estimates a dose-response trend from such results. This method requires the assignment of a single score to each exposure category. We examined how closely meta-analytical categorical regression approximates the results of analysis based on the individual-level continuous exposure. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:language | eng | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:journal | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:citationSubset | IM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:chemical | http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:status | MEDLINE | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:month | May | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:issn | 0957-5243 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:PooleCharlesC | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:BerlinJesse... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:Hertz-Picciot... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:Il'yasovaDora... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:author | pubmed-author:PetersUlrikeU | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:issnType | Print | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:volume | 16 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:owner | NLM | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:authorsComplete | Y | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:pagination | 383-8 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:dateRevised | 2007-11-15 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:meshHeading | pubmed-meshheading:15953980... | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:year | 2005 | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:articleTitle | Choice of exposure scores for categorical regression in meta-analysis: a case study of a common problem. | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:affiliation | Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. dilyasov@wfubmc.edu | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:publicationType | Journal Article | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:publicationType | Comparative Study | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:publicationType | Review | lld:pubmed |
| pubmed-article:15953980 | pubmed:publicationType | Meta-Analysis | lld:pubmed |
| http://linkedlifedata.com/r... | pubmed:referesTo | pubmed-article:15953980 | lld:pubmed |
